Americans Can Not Build Chinese-style High-speed Rail

From Los Angeles to San Francisco, high-speed rail service along the Gulf area, but also has about 400 million people, but after high-speed railway in China's cities, even the smallest of the cities more than 500 million people. This is not an exaggeration, since only densely populated areas will be the construction of high-speed rail, built in remote areas there is no driving force for high-speed rail.

However, the United States can not build high speed rail like China there are other reasons. Compared with the U.S., the distance between major cities in China further, calling the site is relatively small. Site is the speed of the "enemy", but U.S. politicians are all kinds of great efforts spent to build the station.

Moreover, the Chinese government do not need to over-worry about, such as environmental impact and road access and other issues. The real demand for high-speed rail is usually a small slope curvature and flat terrain, it also means how to best build railway lines or near the terrain is essential. But for Americans, in laying the tracks between New York and Chicago, estimated that could provoke head of household, environmental groups and other relevant organizations and the U.S. government entanglement in the case 100 years. Moreover, many have long been the ideal line occupied by the huge road network, estimated that only a few people will believe the government will "tear" the construction of road network to the railway network.

There are other reasons the U.S. does not build Chinese-style high-speed rail. Construction of transport routes should consider environmental issues, the construction of high-speed rail, are the environmental benefits of less than the average railroad, because of the high iron requires more energy to drive. However, some people may argue that high-speed rail more attractive than conventional rail, there will be more people turn to take the train from the plane, so its an even greater environmental benefits. If every time a train at full strength, the situation is true; but if the train was empty, the so-called environmental benefits also hollow. For Americans, the problem is that even though the train more attractive and alternative, but requires more frequent runs. Chinese people can travel by train, because the Chinese cities with large populations, and the distance between cities is very close. However, in the U.S. can not do so.

Purely from a technical point of view, compared with China, the United States so that Americans feel awkward high-speed rail: an unstable, slow, and look old. But from another perspective, despite the slow development of railway network in the United States, Americans have made in other notable achievements: The United States has built many infrastructure, including houses, factories and roads. If the United States instead of demolition and construction of the building of high-speed railway, which will require huge spending. All in all, these things are more than worth the railway system in the cold.

Article Source: http://gamblingarticlessite.com

I am a editor, www.hardware-wholesale.com provides exterior window trim,wma mp3 recorder, welcome to visit!

Please Rate this Article

5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5 

Not yet Rated