Archaeology Dig Raises Controversy About Jerusalem

Eliat Mazar, Israeli Archaeologist, is claiming renovations only just conducted date back 3,000 years. This provides credence to the view that the Holy Bible is not simply a nice story but an real record of history. She states that the defenses around Jerusalem go as far back as King Solomon and illustrate that Jerusalem was a dominant city with a strong centralized ruling system. Mazar affirms that the evidence exhibits that Jerusalem had resources and manpower essential to put up such impressive defenses.
However this detail is in doubt among many scholars. Mazar thinks that Hebrew Kings like David and Solomon ruled from Jerusalem in the 10th century B.C. There are other archaeologists who support the idea that the rule under King David was merely a yarn and that there was not a centralized government during that time period. Mazar held a press conference courtesy of the University of Jerusalem and related that her discovery is the "most significant construction we have from First Temple days in Israel."
She feels that Solomon, King David’s son, constructed the fortifications around the city. These are the structures just excavated. She feels certain that this is the precise construction talked about in the Book of Kings in the Bible. She also believes that this wall shows the power of a central rule because of the massive coordination a structure of that size would call for.
The fortifications also comprised a gatehouse and an extended stretch of wall that's approximately 70 meters long and is based just outside the present-day walls of Jerusalem's Old City. It is interesting to note that these ramparts are also right next to the Temple Mount.
The Old Testament states that Solomon erected the very first Jewish Temple on the very place, but the temple was subsequently raized by the Babylonians; then restructured and improved courtesy of King Herod approximately 2,000 years ago. But after that the Romans destroyed it in 70 A.D., so the question remains if such a large piece could really be found. At this time, the area houses a pair of crucial Islamic edifices - the Dome of the Rock and the Al Aqsa mosque.
It isn't that Mazar was the initial archaeologist to dig out the wall. It was excavated beginning in the 1860s and also in the 1980s. However, she claims that her dig was the only complete excavation and that it was the first to demonstrate compelling evidence for the wall's antiquity. Pieces of pottery were pointed out along the wall and helped Mazar determine the wall's approximate age.
But Mazars conclusions, as mentioned previously, are regarded some censure. Aren Maeir, a professor of archaeology from Bar Ilan University, insists that he should be allowed to look at the substantiation that the walls are as old as Mazar declares. He holds that there are ruins as far back as the 10th century in Jerusalem but declarations that this ancient city was the hub of a sturdy centralized kingdom are a bit of a stretch. While some archaeologists consider that the story of King David and Solomon is but a story, there are others who trust it is strictly fact. And so the debate rages on.

Article Source: http://gamblingarticlessite.com

This article was written and distributed by ClassesandCareers.com, a leader in online education. Start your career off on the right foot with a degree by accredited Online Schools. If you are looking for a specific Distance Learning Course, our website can help you get started.

Please Rate this Article

5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5 

Not yet Rated