Is the Size of Malpractice Settlements Rising?Are Malpractice Settlements Increasing?|Is the Size of Malpractice Settlements Increasing, Decreasing or Staying the Same?}

According to Gary Wais, a Baltimore malpractice lawyer with Wais Law, a Baltimore malpractice law firm Maryland malpractice settlements are going up slightly as the cap is lifted by 15,000 dollars each year. The cap, which attorney Wais is referring to is the statutory cap on non-economic damages awarded in medical malpractice cases.

Non-economic or intangible damages such as the pain, loss, embarrassment and inconvenience of the injury have often swayed juries emotionally and led them to assign high sums to the non-economic damage portion of malpractice cases. However, physician organizations have claimed that these large settlements are driving up the cost of medical care. Insurance companies claim the large pay-outs in medical malpractice cases for pain and suffering and other non-economic damages have required them to sharply increase the cost of medical malpractice insurance. In response to these complaints, state legislators put caps on the amount of non-economic damages that could be awarded. The caps are different in every state, some states, for example, have no caps, some states have caps on physician fees and on punitive damages and seven states have repealed the caps in rulings that declared them to be unconstitutional.

According to professional studies, malpractice claims have been responsible for only a fraction of the rising medical care costs. According to many of the giant insurers, medical malpractice caps do help to control spending, but practically speaking they only lead to a 1% savings in costs. Such a small increase in cost can hardly be held responsible for the overall rise in medical costs, which far exceeds 1%.

Recently, there has been a move in some states to repeal the payment caps. The caps have been attacked as being unconstitutional in that they put unnatural controls on the thinking of juries and judges during the trial process. As one lawmaker put it,

"Damage caps (which are essentially artificial and arbitrary limits placed on the amount of financial compensation that a victim of medical malpractice can receive) completely negate the judgment and intelligence of juries, who are trusted enough to vote in officials and put people to death."

The caps also tie the hands of the trial judge, who might feel that a particular plaintiff deserves far more than the sum allowed by the caps. While seven states, as noted above, have alredy repealed the caps, this past November of 2010 the Maryland Appellate court turned down a similar effort to repeal the caps in Maryland. The current limit for non-economic damage in Maryland is just under $700,000, nevertheless, courts can still deliver monster settlements to claimants.

In a recent case in Baltimore County, for example, a family was awarded 13,000,000 dollars when their child was born with severe cerebral palsy, after their physician failed to inform them of all their options during the later stages of the pregnancy. In this case, the large settlement was compensation for the lifelong cost of medical treatment for the severely injured child In the face of non-economic damage caps. Juries have been known to increase the amount of money awarded for economic damages as compensation for the cap on the non-economic damages.

While theoretically malpractice settlements might be bolstered by large penalty damage assessments levied against Doctors who acted with malicious intent, in fact, this rarely occurs. In Maryland, for example, claimants must show that the Doctor acted with malice against the victim, and this is rarely the case. Most negligent physicians have erred in the treatment rendered to the patient; however, they have no particular grudge against the victims of their sub-standard care.

Article Source: http://gamblingarticlessite.com

According to Gary Wais, a Baltimore malpractice lawyer with Wais Law, a Baltimore malpractice law firm, Maryland malpractice settlements are going up 15,000 dollars each year.

Please Rate this Article

5 out of 54 out of 53 out of 52 out of 51 out of 5 

Not yet Rated